Sony WF-1000XM6 vs AirPods Pro 3: I Tested Both for Two Weeks — Here’s the Honest Truth

I went into this comparison expecting a clear winner. Apple had already earned serious praise for the AirPods Pro 3, claiming best-in-class active noise cancellation. Then Sony launched the WF-1000XM6 and made the exact same claim. So I spent two weeks rotating between both pairs — on flights, busy streets, morning runs, and even while trying to sleep — to find out which one actually deserves a spot in your ears.

Before anything else: both brands sent me units to test, and neither had any influence over my findings. I genuinely don’t care which one you pick — I just want you to pick the right one.

Sony WF-1000XM6 and AirPods Pro 3 earbuds held side by side against a blue background with comparison title text
Sony WF-1000XM6 vs AirPods Pro 3 — a two-week real-world comparison covering ANC, sound quality, comfort, microphone performance, and features.

ANC: Sony Pulls Ahead, But Only Just

Testing ANC isn’t a single number game. I tested across four scenarios: low-frequency noise (jet/bus rumble), high-frequency noise (voices), quiet environment hiss, and wind performance.

For low-frequency blocking, the AirPods Pro 3 held on impressively at 65.5 dB. But the Sony WF-1000XM6 pushed further to 67 dB — a small gap on paper that you can genuinely feel on a plane. For voices and high-frequency sounds, Sony blocked up to 48 dB versus the AirPods’ 43 dB, likely due to Sony’s foam ear tips providing better passive isolation. In quiet environments, both are dead silent — no hissing, no white noise from either. Wind handling was essentially identical: both let through a subtle amount on really gusty days, but nothing dramatic.

ANC TestAirPods Pro 3Sony WF-1000XM6Winner
Low Frequency (Jet/Bus)65.5 dB67 dBSony
High Frequency (Voices)43 dB48 dBSony
Quiet Environment HissSilentSilentTie
Wind RejectionSubtleSubtleTie
Close-up of Sony WF-1000XM6 earbuds during a low-frequency active noise cancellation test
The Sony WF-1000XM6 blocking 67 dB of low-frequency noise, edging out the AirPods Pro 3 at 65.5 dB in the jet-sound test

Transparency Mode: AirPods Feel More Natural

I tested this by wearing one earbud from each brand simultaneously — left ear Sony, right ear AirPods. Both reproduce ambient sound well, but the AirPods feel more open and natural. With the Sony, there’s a slightly closed-off, plugged feeling even in transparency mode, plus marginally more white noise. Sony does offer 20 adjustable ambient sound levels in its app plus a voice-filtering pass-through mode — impressive flexibility. But for raw, forget-they’re-in-your-ears performance, AirPods win here.

Person wearing one Sony earbud and one AirPods Pro 3 earbud
One Sony WF-1000XM6 and one AirPods Pro 3 worn simultaneously to directly compare transparency mode performance

Sound Quality: Sony Wins on Flexibility

This is genuinely personal preference territory, so I’ll lay out the differences rather than declare a definitive winner.

AspectAirPods Pro 3Sony WF-1000XM6
Sound SignatureNeutral, balancedWarm, V-shaped (bass-forward)
High-End DetailSharp, sometimes sibilantSmoother, less fatiguing
EqualizerNoneFull EQ in app
Codec SupportAAC onlyLDAC (hi-res, Android)
Best ForClarity, podcasts, acousticBass-heavy genres, casual listening

Sony wins this category for me because of the built-in EQ and LDAC support. The AirPods sound great out of the box, but you can’t adjust them at all. That lack of control is a real limitation at $249.

Price, Microphone & Design at a Glance

The AirPods Pro 3 retail at $249 versus Sony’s $329 — that $80 gap matters at this tier, and it’s a clear win for Apple.

For the microphone test, I wanted real-world outdoor conditions, so I had a friend run the outdoor test for me while I listened back to the recordings. For privacy, I’ve blurred his face in the comparison image, but what matters is what the audio captured. On a busy road with cars passing and light wind, Sony did a noticeably better job filtering out background noise. The AirPods picked up more echo and ambient compression outdoors. Indoors, though, the AirPods sounded more natural and less processed — making them the better call quality choice for offices or quieter environments. It honestly came down to a split: AirPods for indoors, Sony for outdoors.

CategoryAirPods Pro 3Sony WF-1000XM6Winner
Price$249$329AirPods
Mic (Indoors)More naturalSlightly compressedAirPods
Mic (Outdoors)Some echoBetter noise rejectionSony
Water ResistanceIP57IPX4AirPods
Volume ControlsPinch + Swipe stemTap gestures + VoiceAirPods (marginal)
Case FeaturesSpeaker, lanyard hook, MagSafeUSB-C, wireless chargingAirPods
Side-by-side outdoor microphone test showing Sony WF-1000XM6 on the left and Apple AirPods Pro 3 on the right, both worn on a busy street with traffic in the background
Left: Sony WF-1000XM6 worn during the outdoor microphone test — Right: Apple AirPods Pro 3 in the same real-world environment. Faces blurred for privacy.

Fit, Comfort, and the Sleeping Test

This is where things get genuinely nuanced. The AirPods use silicone-foam hybrid tips — easy to insert, soft, and durable. Sony uses full foam tips that grip your ears more aggressively. Sony wins for stability on runs; those foam tips aren’t going anywhere. But for extended wear, AirPods are more comfortable — less pressure, less heat, less ear fatigue. I’ve also had two Sony foam tips physically break on me, including one mid-flight. If you travel with them, keep spares.

For sleeping, AirPods are the better choice. They run cooler, allow more airflow, and don’t create that expanding pressure sensation. Neither is ideal for side-sleeping specifically, but AirPods are more tolerable for longer overnight use.

Side-by-side comparison of AirPods Pro 3 ear tips and Sony WF-1000XM6 foam ear tips laid flat on a surface
AirPods Pro 3 silicone-foam hybrid tips alongside Sony WF-1000XM6 foam ear tips — the difference in material affects both comfort and long-term durability

Features: AirPods Win on What Matters Most

Sony has more features overall — low-latency gaming audio, true multipoint device switching (works across any devices, not just Apple), ear-scanning personalization, background music room mode, Quick Listen hold gesture, and voice commands. It’s a packed app. But AirPods have two category-defining features that Sony simply can’t match: a clinically accurate hearing aid mode for mild-to-moderate hearing loss, and a genuinely accurate heart rate sensor. Those aren’t gimmicks — they can meaningfully improve someone’s daily life. Add seamless Apple ecosystem switching, Find My precision tracking, and MagSafe charging, and AirPods edge ahead on features despite having fewer of them.

Final Verdict

After two weeks, the final score sits at Sony 8, AirPods 7 — genuinely close.

CategoryWinner
ANC (Low & High Frequency)Sony
Transparency ModeAirPods
Sound Quality / FlexibilitySony
PriceAirPods
Microphone IndoorsAirPods
Microphone OutdoorsSony
Water ResistanceAirPods
Fit / StabilitySony
Comfort / Sleep UseAirPods
FeaturesAirPods
Battery & ChargingAirPods (MagSafe edge)
Overall ScoreSony 8 — AirPods 7
Final comparison scorecard showing Sony WF-1000XM6 and AirPods Pro 3 results across all tested categories
The final category-by-category scorecard after two weeks of real-world testing — Sony edges ahead 8 to 7 in a remarkably close comparison

My honest recommendation: if you want the best noise cancellation, full sound customization, and cross-platform device switching, go Sony. If you’re in the Apple ecosystem, value comfort, or could genuinely use hearing aid functionality, AirPods Pro 3 are worth every penny of the $80 savings.

Leave a Comment